Backtest Results Posts

Advanced Droid Tactics

Reviews and Launches

I don’t think that Advanced Droid Tactics is bad, I think that it’s not better than normal MegaDroid. Yes, you will have more trades, but it’s very dangerous to lose much more. As a proof I will publish backtest results for previous period:

I used next settings:
Period: 2008/01/01 - 2009/01/01
Deposit: $10000
Broker: FXDD Demo
RiskLevel: 0.2
Recovery: true

GMToffset-2

Net Profit: -$9117.33
Draw-down: 95%

GMToffset+2

Net Profit: $732
Draw-down: 85%

GMToffset+4

Net Profit: -$9608
Draw-down: 98%

GMToffset+6

Net Profit: $2933.33
Draw-down: 95%

Normal GMToffset as instructed in MegaDroid manual

Net Profit: $62438
Draw-down: 23%

Advanced Droid Tactics is performing well only in 2009. You can test it yourself and run backtests for 2008-2009, 2007-2008 and so on. You will see that this strategy is not stable as MegaDroid is. The feature of MegaDroid is that it’s accuracy is about 95%, this advanced tactics is much less accurate.

I’m not using ADT and don’t recommend that to you. MegaDroid team doesn’t recommend this advanced tactics also.

MegaDroid’s GMToffsets on IBFX for backtest

Other

I noticed, that on IBFX MegaDroid robot is showing better backtest results with GMToffset=”0″. Seems, that there is another mistake in the manual.

As its backtest results depends on GMToffset setting, I’m going to publish correct GMToffset values for different brokers.

I selected correct GMToffset experimentaly, so these information may not be 100% correctly.

Forex MegaDroid backtest results on FXDD in 2009

Trading Results

Here is my backtest results on FXDD for this period: 2009.01.02 - 2009.04.10 (today). Seems that MegaDroid was very profitable this year. We will hope, that this profitability will be supported with Live or Demo trading   results…

You can download Full Account Statement

Note: When you are doing backtests on FXDD, don’t forget to use GMToffset=”3″. Seems that there is a mistake in User Manual.